Eén stapje vooruit: parlementsleden kritisch over internetfilter

Meeting the Privacy Movement

“Verander je wachtwoord regelmatig” is slecht advies

In 2013-2015 I made a snapshot of the Berlin-based privacy movement. Join me over the next few weeks and find out how these privacy activists operate, organize, and express dissent.

It is December 29, 2013 and digital activist, technologist, and researcher Jacob AppelbaumThis research was finalized in 2015 and does not take into account the changes within the movement that have occurred since the allegations of abuse against Appelbaum in 2016. closes the year with a talk titled To Protect and Infect, Part 2 at the 30th edition of the Chaos Communication Congress in Hamburg, Germany. It is the first edition of the congress after the publication of the Snowden documents, and also the first edition I am attending.

The Snowden documents

In the lectureAppelbaum's talk at 30C3., Appelbaum elaborates on the kind of surveillance activities the United States National Security Agency (NSA) deploys. He reveals, among other things, the existence of a dragnet surveillance system called TURMOIL. The information he shares, originates from the set of classified documentsThe Courage Foundation and Transparency Toolkit created a search tool to easily access the Snowden documents. that whistleblower Edward Snowden collected while working as an NSA system administrator. In June, 2013, Snowden decided to share these documents with the press, explaining that he does not “want to live in a world where we have no privacy and no freedomThis quotation was taken from Glenn Greenwald's book 'No Place to Hide. Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State'.” and that he finds that the public has the right to know what their government is doing to them and doing on their behalf. Later, at the 2014 Dutch Big Brother AwardsEdward Snowden addressed the audience live from Russia., he will add that he considered the NSA’s surveillance programs such a severe violation of human rights that he felt it was his obligation to make the documents public. Snowden’s statements are related to a larger, ongoing public debate about surveillance: how much knowledge about citizens is just and necessary for governments to possess and what actions are legitimate to obtain that information?

The activists

In the months after the Chaos Communication Congress, the subject of privacy and Internet surveillance is not the only thing that increasingly drew my attention. The activists involved in the discussion did, too. Four activists surfaced in the wake of the Snowden leaks and quickly took on leading roles in the debate: Jacob Appelbaum, Glenn Greenwald, Sarah Harrison, and Laura Poitras. Although these four individuals had shared beliefs, they do not share a common background. At the time of the first publications Glenn Greenwald worked as a journalist, Laura Poitras as a documentary filmmaker, Jacob Appelbaum as a technologist, and Sarah Harrison as a journalist and legal researcher for WikiLeaks. Although they are certainly not the only individuals who are relevant to the larger group of activists who work on privacy and surveillance issues, their diversity really is a reflection of the diversity of the group concerned with these issues.

The movement

Eventually I became so interested in the subject of privacy and the activists working on it, that I decided to turn this interest into academic research. In my master thesis Meeting the Privacy Movement. Dissent in the Digital AgeIn my master thesis I described the privacy movement as I encountered it from 2013 to 2015. I tried to capture the privacy movement as I encountered it in the first few years after the Snowden revelations. The more research I did into the movement, the more it struck me that it is incredibly diverse, decentralized, and therefore complicated to define. In spite of this, expressing dissent is one of the key characteristics of the movement. It is where activists find each other and share their ideas with the rest of the world. So what does dissent look like in the privacy movement? I identified three different ways in which the privacy movement expresses dissent, namely through whistleblowing, through art, and through protest. Each contributes to the understanding of the privacy movement as a whole.

Expressions of dissent

First, whistleblowing is interesting because its role is threefold. Besides whistleblowing being a way in which the privacy movement expresses dissent, whistleblowers are also a vital source of information to the movement and furthermore often become activists within the movement themselves. Second, activist art is a way for the privacy movement to communicate its ideas and goals, to members of the movement as well as to the larger public. Although there is only a small group of activists involved in the process of creating the art, it does affect the movement in its entirety. To illustrate how art and activism merge, I analyzed two art projects associated with the movement: Panda to PandaLaura Poitras documented the project in the short film 'The Art of Dissent'. and Anything to Say?.You can follow the 'Anything to Say?' project on Twitter. Last, the privacy movement also expresses dissent through protest. This is done both through traditional types of protest such as street demonstrations, as well as through protest forms that can only exist online, for example the development, promotion, and use of tools that provide more anonymity for Internet users.

Although dissent is an element that characterizes the privacy movement, it is certainly not the only one; so do its untraditional role of leadership within the movement and Berlin as its physical meeting place. If you would like to read more about the role of leadership and meeting places within the privacy movement, you can find more information about this in my thesis.

Starting next week, I will be publishing a series of articles in which I will explore whistleblowing, art, and protest as expressions of dissent. First up is the exceptional role whistleblowing has within the privacy movement.

  1. Jacob Appelbaum abuse victim


    I am one of the women who has been abused by Jacob Appelbaum and his entourage. I kindly request that you and Bits of Freedom please stop giving glory to this man who has done tremendous damage to the privacy human rights movement and has demoralized and driven many activists away with his widely documented and denounced abusive behaviour. Many organizations such as the Chaos Computer Club, Noisebridge and Debian have denounced Jacob Appelbaum and barred him from attenting their events. I have to wonder why yourself and by extention Bits of Freedom are pretending like nothing has happened and are continuing to cover Jacob Appelbaum in a positive light. Don’t you people read the New York Times? https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/technology/tor-project-jacob-appelbaum.html It’s time for Bits of Freedom to join the aforementioned organizations and to do what’s right. Please stop giving a podium to abusers. Many of Appelbaum’s victims are themselves privacy activists. Why don’t you cover them instead of covering an exposed abuser?

    • Hans de Zwart

      Thank you for your courage to write your comment under this post. I am terribly sorry to hear about what has happened to you.

      The thesis that Loes has written about the privacy movement in that particular part of the world and at that particular point of time, won a
      Dutch award for internet related research. We believe her research gives an interesting insight in how the digital world, social protest and
      culture and the arts are interwoven.

      It is in no way our intention to glorify Jacob Appelbaum. This is why in the first paragraph of the post Loes links to a Guardian article
      (https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/oct/11/jacob-appelbaum-tor-project-sexual-assault-allegations) and writes “This research was finalized in 2015 and does not take into account the changes within the movement that have occured since the allegations of abuse against Appelbaum in 2016.”

      Let’s hope that her series of posts will help her readers reflect on how we fight for digital rights.

Geef een antwoord

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.

Deze website gebruikt Akismet om spam te verminderen. Bekijk hoe je reactie-gegevens worden verwerkt.

Help mee en steun ons

Door mijn bijdrage ondersteun ik Bits of Freedom, dat kan maandelijks of eenmalig.